insemtives - Incentives for Semantics Follow us on Twitter | RSS | Atom | Pingback
  • Back to blog homepage
  • Back to INSEMTIVES homepage

Author of the month

  • Our author achieved posts in April 2013.

Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • September 2011

Links

  • Insemtives Website
  • Internal Wiki

Internal

  • Log in

Tag cloud

    paper game video badges facebook social initiative google workshop annotation games startup social games "games with a purpose" semantic web collaboration motivation conference semantic annotation image community incentives gamification ontologies tagging

INSEMTIVES - Incentives
for Semantics

« Previous post
Next post »

Great gamification talks

Gamification is getting a lot of attention. Two great informative examples are the TED talks by Seth Priebatsch and Tom Chatfield where they present a small list of some game dynamics that can make a users be more engaged when using the gamified applications.
These dynamics are very interesting and, whenever possible, should be taken into account when defining applications which want to be engaging for users.
Some of these dynamycs extracted from the above talks are:
  • Appointment dynamic: a dynamic in which to succeed, one must return at a predefined time (generally at a predefined place) to take a predetermined action. For example: happy hours and Farmville.
  • Influence and Status: the ability of one player to modify the behavior of other’s actions through social behaviors. For example: status in credit cards and report cards.
  • Progression dynamic: a dynamic in which success is granularly displayed and measured through the process of completing simple itemized tasks. If we present a person telling him/her that s/he is incomplete, and that there is a series of easy granular steps to be completed, then the person will try to do them to be shown as complete (to the community, thus using influence dynamics). For example: LinkedIn progress bar for profile info completion.
  • Communal discovery: A dynamic wherein an entire community is rallied to work together to solve a challenge. Everyone (possibly in a given community) has to work together to achieve something. Leverages the network which is society to solve hard problems (crowd-sourcing). For example: the Darpa balloon challenge.
  • Multiple long and short-term aims: this makes it interesting and less monotone and considers the fact that sometimes people are more focused and concentrated; therefore simple tasks can be achieved when concentration is low, and more difficult tasks when concentration is higher.
  • Reward all effort: everything is rewarded, there is no notion of failure. Why have games where you can loose? why not just level up like in World of Warcraft?
  • Rapid, frequent, clear feedback: it is very very hard for people to learn, if they cannot link actions to consequences.
  • An element of uncertainty: known rewards excite people, but unknown rewards are even more interesting, because if there is a certain level of uncertainty that I might get something even better, then this attracts people interest and keeps them doing  things over and over again.

Tags: games, gamification, social games

Author: Juan Pane,
Posted on Friday, April 1st, 2011 at 7:10 pm,
Categories: Uncategorized.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

seventh framework programme
© 2009 - 2011 insemtives | RSS | Atom | Design by titus